Bates-citable answers
Every answer carries Bates number, page, and paragraph. Click the citation to highlight the source.
Litigation workspace
Drop a 2,000-document production. Ask in natural language. Leapable returns Bates-citable answers in seconds - click any citation to open the source at the highlighted paragraph.
Used by litigators across IP, employment, commercial disputes, white-collar defense, and personal injury.

100,000+ page corpora supported
Legal productions
Bates
Bates-citable answers
Audit
Append-only audit log
Local
Privilege-safe local storage
191 MCP tools
Available to agents
How it works
The litigation flow is intentionally plain: drop the production, keep the case inside a matter vault, ask from Claude, then open the cited Bates page before the answer enters a motion or deposition outline.
The production clock
You inherit a 2,000-doc production. 100,000+ pages. Your 14-day deadline is closing. You need the smoking gun on page 649 of document 1489 and page 1288 of document 342. ChatGPT fabricates. Boolean keyword search misses meaning. Manual review is weeks of paralegal time.
60-second litigation demo
The walkthrough follows one matter: fall-protection training admissions, six cited Bates answers in seconds, then one click into the exact deposition paragraph.
Input
2,000-document production, transcript pages, and exhibits.
Ask
Show every admission about fall protection training.
Evidence
Six Bates answers, page 649 highlighted at ACME001489.
Transcript pending until the litigation walkthrough is uploaded.
Capabilities
Every answer carries Bates number, page, and paragraph. Click the citation to highlight the source.
Matter vaults stay siloed. Cross-matter search is disabled by default so privileged work stays inside the matter boundary.
Compress a transcript review from hours to minutes while every quote remains verified against the transcript.
Map RFPs to responsive Bates ranges and generate Word-ready response drafts with citations preserved.
Typical tasks
01
Drop production, search by claim element, receive a cited evidence list, then verify in one click.
02
Load transcript, ask for admissions, contradictions, and timeline items, then export a page-line summary.
03
Search a firm's prior briefs from matter-scoped vaults and cite analogous arguments with exact case and page.
Comparison
| Capability | Harvey | CoCounsel | Newcase | Leapable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per-seat / month | $1,200+ | $200-500 | custom | $49-$99 |
| Local-first | No | No | No | Yes |
| MCP-native | No | No | No | Yes |
| Bring your AI client | No | No | No | Yes |
| Bates-citable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Privilege architecture | Cloud | Cloud | Cloud | Local vault |
Counter-positioning
Stanford HAI's 2024 benchmark article reported Westlaw AI-Assisted Research hallucinated more than 34% of the time. Leapable's reranker uses an explicit low-confidence floor - when evidence is absent, Leapable abstains.
Sources: Stanford HAI, 2024 and Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2025.
Offer
Trust
Workspace mode runs on your machine. Text and Markdown stay local, and OCR for PDFs and images is transient rather than a hosted matter repository.
Leapable provides citations and audit evidence. Admissibility is determined by counsel and the court.
Uninstalling removes the local runtime and local matter data goes with you. There is no forced hosted lock-in path.
The leapable_db_backup tool exports a portable .sqlite3 file
for firm backup routines.
Connectors for those systems are roadmap Phase 2 work. Today, import litigation exports and matter folders through the file-system sources flow.
Yes. leapable_export_stream exports source-linked JSON-Lines for drafting
workflows; use your Word template or downstream drafting process to format the final
brief.
Scanned PDFs and images use transient cloud OCR for page-cited output. Plain text and Markdown use local extraction.
Install Leapable, connect your AI client, and ask legal questions that can be checked at the source before they reach a draft.